Monday, October 5, 2015

At Telstra, mobile CRM is a sales tool—and a selling point.

It is a challenging and exciting time in the enterprise mobility space, given the pace of change in the market and many organizations thinking about how they can best leverage these developments. Telstra, the largest telecommunications and services provider in Australia, boasts a strong B2B sales force and is a full-service provider of connectivity and IT applications and services. The company is also fast becoming a leader in personal productivity and mobile customer relationship management (CRM).

Until recently, Telstra salespeople across Australia couldn’t take advantage of enterprise mobility out in the field. They recorded sales opportunities offline and waited to go into the office to enter information into a PC-based CRM system, which resulted in reduced customer responsiveness, lower productivity, and inaccurate forecasting. Telstra’s enterprise IT leadership began work with Oracle and Infosys in 2013, to develop an enhanced mobile CRM system that would improve the customer experience and be a showcase for helping customers embrace new technologies to drive productivity and innovation in their own organizations.

According to Peter Scougall, chief of staff for global sales in Telstra’s Global Enterprise and Services division, the IT team knew that Telstra’s sales staff wanted a more modern CRM application that was mobile-enabled. But first, IT needed to evaluate the existing system, tools, and business processes and develop a clear mobile CRM strategy. Then it had to involve end users to determine the best (and fastest) way to execute an improved system for the sales force.

What they found was a solution that could serve internal and external clients. “It would provide a double benefit,” says Scougall. “Building a new, simpler mobile CRM system would enhance our productivity and our responsiveness to customers. But we could also showcase our solutions to our customers, so they could start thinking about their enterprise mobility roadmap in the context of their own business strategies.”

With these objectives top of mind, in 2013 Scougall partnered with Roque De Souza, general manager of global sales in Global Enterprise and Services, to outline enterprise mobility CRM system requirements. The two then worked with Oracle Diamond Partner Infosys to upgrade to Oracle’s Siebel CRM 8.1.1.9 to refresh desktop functionality and provide a new device-agnostic mobile solution. The first prototype was ready in just six weeks. ROI has also been lightning fast: Increased productivity allowed the B2B sales force to collectively spend more hours with customers every week. Employees could structure their workdays to meet the needs of customers wherever they had mobile or Wi-Fi coverage.

And the system is helping Telstra’s sales team share its own enterprise mobile success story. “We can talk with passion about enterprise mobility because we’ve lived it and implemented it successfully,” says Scougall. “Customers who are just beginning to craft a plan of their own have a very keen appetite to learn from people who have already had success with mobile implementations.”

Moving Market

Shortening the sales cycle, improving productivity, and delivering a better customer experience have translated directly into real improvements to Telstra’s bottom line, considering the predicted boom for enterprise mobility. According to research firm International Data Corporation (IDC), the number of mobile workers will reach 1.3 billion and will account for 37.2 percent of the global workforce in 2015. Further, analysis published by MarketsandMarkets predicts that the enterprise mobility market will grow from US$72.34 billion in 2013 to US$284.70 billion by 2019.

However, a 2013 survey of IT decision-makers by the Yankee Group found that nearly one-third still did not have an enterprise mobility strategy firmly in place. That represented a dual opportunity for Telstra.

“We realized that not only would we benefit from a mobile CRM solution, but there is a huge opportunity to talk to customers about the whole use case of enterprise mobility, from access and connectivity, to hardware and devices, to security, services, and applications,” says Scougall. “There’s nothing more powerful than a demonstration where clients can see the possibilities of mobility for their own organizations, and we can also profile the coverage, reliability, and speed of Telstra’s integrated wire-line and mobile networks and other services.”

Mobile First

With a clear mandate from salespeople across the company, Telstra business leaders agreed in 2013 to upgrade from their existing CRM system to Siebel CRM 8.1.1.9 to provide both much-needed CRM mobility features and updated desktop functionality. In his 22 years with Telstra, Scougall has watched plenty of IT projects get waylaid by extended timelines and solutions created by IT staff irrespective of business user needs. But given the market opportunity and the existing state of Telstra’s mobile strategy, he was determined that the outcome of the CRM project would be different.

“From the beginning, Roque and I were appointed as joint leads,” he recalls. “So the initiative was led jointly by the business and IT. We received excellent support from our partner and developer, Infosys. I think the foundation of our success was that it was a team-based transformation, and effective change management was pivotal.”

To keep the project on track, efforts to streamline and mobile-enable sales processes were tackled in tandem with technical desktop and CRM user interface and workflow development tasks. Account executives, sales reps, and managers also participated in codesign workshops to ensure that the new solution would meet business user productivity and mobility requirements.

Roheet Tauro, project manager at Infosys, observes that it was critical to maintain a tight project scope because Telstra had set an ambitious goal to introduce a new release once a month. Team members were dispersed, so those in Australia could meet to make design decisions and then hand off the project at the end of the day for team members in India to execute. So in essence the team adopted a “follow the sun” methodology to respond overnight to the business and IT teams’ requirements.

“By having nimble project management and going through rapid prototyping and development, we were able to focus first on all the items that would yield maximum value and quickly eliminate features that ended up not being relevant,” Tauro says.

And because Infosys experts have deep experience with mobile enablement for Oracle’s Siebel CRM solutions, they created an application design for Telstra that incorporated the simplified single-screen workflow designs commonly associated with mobile solutions rather than using the multiple-view tabs approach seen in legacy enterprise applications. From the very first prototype introduced in just six weeks, more than 25 different fields were eliminated and four screens were removed from the workflow.

Speed Cycle

In less than a year, Telstra’s B2B sales force was able to start taking advantage of the new device-agnostic mobile Siebel CRM solution. Today, when meeting with customers in the field, Telstra reps can navigate the application using large “tiles” to see summary information, and then tap or swipe to access specific fields. In addition, Microsoft Outlook and LinkedIn are synced with the mobile solution, which makes it easy for reps to keep track of customer and contact information.

The productivity results from the new CRM system are impressive. According to De Souza, a salesperson can now load a sales opportunity using the mobile-friendly CRM version in an average time of just 90 seconds, reduced from an average time of three minutes from the desktop interface. After a customer meeting, the rep can literally tap a few buttons, enter six fields, and create a sales opportunity. Even better, after a sales opportunity is entered from the field into the CRM system, sales managers in the office can use the updated desktop CRM system to pick up the opportunity in near-real time and start activating the sales teams’ resources before the sales rep even gets back to the office. What previously took up to 72 hours from opportunity creation to resource allocation now can be done in near-real time.

“The time from when we start a conversation with a customer to when we put a proposal in front of them—that time has reduced dramatically,” confirms De Souza.

But productivity is definitely not the only payoff. It may be more difficult to quantify, but De Souza reports that the new mobile CRM solution has enhanced employee engagement. Salespeople across the board are happy that the solution is tailored to meet their needs and wasn’t just handed to them by the IT department. More importantly, they are no longer tethered to the desktop and have the tools to do their jobs on the go.

The CRM solution is also helping Telstra B2B sales improve customer relationships by accessing tacit customer knowledge that was not easily captured before. Scougall points out that sales teams working in the B2B space often collaborate by sharing documents, insight, and contacts. In the past, this collaboration mostly occurred via e-mail contacts. The new CRM system now provides a single repository where all tacit information and knowledge around a customer is stored.

“Now, team members can access this collective knowledge when serving B2B customers in a much richer way than was available with point-to-point e-mails,” says Scougall.

Second Wave

Although the new CRM capabilities are unquestionably a success on all fronts, improvements are already on the drawing board. Plans call for the CRM system to be developed further to automate how sales resources are assigned and allocated—potentially with Oracle Sales Cloud. But first on the horizon is streamlining the mobile application so 80 percent of the most frequent CRM tasks can be accessed quickly from the home screen. It will be simpler and faster, and it is expected to lead to improvements in forecasting, accuracy, productivity, and near-real-time information.

“When we get the updated CRM application into the hands of our sales team, that’s where they’ll really start to see the power of enterprise mobile apps,” observes De Souza.

De Souza and Scougall are also staying true to Telstra’s mission to help B2B customers embrace enterprise mobility. They understand that corporations around the world are facing the issues of how to increase productivity, bring technology advancement into place, and keep employees happy with the mobility tools they need. Some customers have observed Telstra sales reps using the mobile CRM application in meetings and have inquired if they can buy the solution for themselves.

“Our customers are asking if we can help enable mobility for them, so our CRM solution is allowing us to showcase innovation and thought leadership in this area,” says Scougall. “It was the combined capability of Telstra, Infosys, and Oracle that brought our mobility solution together so successfully.”

Amdocs Order Delivery Orchestrator solution

Amdocs (Nasdaq:DOX), the leading provider of customer experience solutions, today launched the Amdocs Order Delivery Orchestrator solution, enabling service providers to better support their business customers across the order delivery lifecycle whilst providing increased agility, improved time-to-cash and reduced cost for the delivery of complex, enterprise orders. The solution supports hybrid order execution consisting of both traditional and virtual services (e.g. virtual fire wall or virtual customer premises equipment).

The Amdocs Order Delivery Orchestrator enables dynamic, catalog-based orchestration of complex orders across lines of business, supporting orchestration across multiple vendors' fulfillment stacks and providing end-to-end visibility and project management capabilities. The strong orchestration and visibility capabilities provide real-time insights and conflict resolution throughout the order execution, dynamically adjusting the order, improving order delivery time, SLAs and customer satisfaction.

"To improve the business customers' experience, service providers must develop their service delivery to span multiple fulfillment stacks, including services in virtual and hybrid networks," said Rebecca Prudhomme, vice president for product and solutions marketing at Amdocs. "The new Amdocs Order Delivery Orchestrator solution is part of Amdocs' CES suite. Along with best practices and services for specific enterprise service use cases, the new solution increases service delivery efficiencies for complex orders, whereby improving the experience of business customers and accelerating the business value for the service provider."

"With consumer revenues remaining flat, service providers are focusing on the enterprise segment to accelerate their business and financial growth," said Caroline Chappell, senior analyst for NFV and Cloud at Heavy Reading. "New research# has identified order delivery orchestration as a key investment area for service providers to tackle the challenge of fulfilling complex service orders and providing a differentiated customer service."

The research, conducted by Heavy Reading on behalf of Amdocs, highlighted:

Almost half (44 percent) of respondents are not satisfied with their service delivery solution/capabilities and are willing to invest. The most common complaint from their business customers pertaining to service delivery is missed installation expectations/ SLAs (47 percent)
76 percent of operators believe they will need new/updated service delivery capabilities to deliver services combining NFV and traditional network elements
# The survey results are based on qualitative surveys in November and December 2014 of executives at 54 major service providers across North America, Europe, Central and Latin America.

Sprint extends managed services pact with Amdocs

Amdocs, a provider of customer experience systems and services, today said that Sprint, one of North America’s leading wireless service providers, has extended its managed services deal with the company for its billing and customer care systems, and selected Amdocs Convergent Charging to rapidly create and monetize mobile data services.

Amdocs will continue to manage key business processes including billing, customer care and IT infrastructure management under a managed services model hosted at an Amdocs data centre. The agreement extension includes continued support of the Sprint, Boost Mobile, Virgin Mobile USA and Assurance Wireless brands.

Amdocs Convergent Charging, which provides convergent, real-time charging, enables a comprehensive set of mobile services such as hybrid customers, and shared wallet, which will enable Sprint to accelerate time to market for these innovative new services.

“One of our top priorities as we continue to build Sprint’s nationwide 4G LTE network is to combine the ability to quickly deliver the new services our customers demand, as well as generate revenues from those services,” said Peter Campbell, CIO, Sprint. “Selecting Amdocs Convergent Charging 
reinforces our strategic Amdocs partnership, and gives us a convergent, real-time charging system that can generate revenues quickly.”

“Sprint’s decision to extend our long-term managed services agreement and select new capabilities with Amdocs Convergent Charging reflects the value to service providers of the Amdocs CES product portfolio, combined with our managed services model, in terms of quickly rolling out new services and introducing cost savings,” said Rebecca Prudhomme, Vice President - Product and Solutions Marketing, Amdocs. ”Sprint subscribers will be able to leverage new services, such as voice over LTE (VoLTE) and shared wallets to ensure they are getting the most from their mobile devices.”

Amdocs attempts to redefine the data plan with new launch

Amdocs looks to have stolen a march on its rivals with the launch of a product aimed at helping mobile operators to capture the multi-billion euro growth in mobile data.

In doing so, they are attempting to redefine the humble data plan: “Service providers need to offer customers a data ‘experience’ not just a data ‘plan’,” commented Amdocs’ David Sharpley in a briefing with European Communications.

Specifically, the US-based vendor claims its new Data Experience Solution will enable mobile operators to provide consumers with highly customsed offers more quickly.

The system is a mixture of hardware and software that includes a policy control and charging engine, a product catalogue and subscriber management functions.

Amdocs has pre-configured a range of what it is calling “market offers” within the system. There are two that immediately jump out: tiered services – data plans based on time, volume and applications; and a “shared wallet” – a data quota that can be shared between families or enterprises.

Other offers include a temporary add-on service that enables operators to automatically provide customers with features such as data roaming, and a bill shock prevention tool that enables customers to set a personal usage limit.

Sharpley said operators had total flexibility to configure the market offers according to their particular needs.

The system is also set up to offload traffic from 3G to WiFi and is preconfigured to work on LTE networks.

From a monetisation standpoint, Sharpley said he expected operators to benefit in particular from upsell opportunities such as giving customers the chance to buy more data once they approached their limit or offering roaming add-ons.

The company conducted research across the industry before settling on the offers it is coming to market with, although Sharpley added that they intended to launch new offers in due course.

It is the company’s first major launch since the acquisition of Bridgewater Systems and Amdocs says the system has been tested on operator networks serving more than 100 million subscribers.

“Mobile data is the single biggest opportunity for operators,” confirmed Sharpley. “The need [for new data solutions] is great as operators need to develop competitive differentiators.”

Currently, operators are either not offering many of the features this new system provides or if they are they are being done through one-off customisations of existing legacy systems, according to Sharpley.

Amdocs is selling its new system on a license basis and Sharpley said the company was “extremely bullish” about operators signing up to buy it.

This next generation of data plans and associated certainly looks like a winner from a customer’s point of view, but how easily operators can integrate them into their existing offers and whether they are fully sold on the promised monetisation benefits will ultimately seal this system’s fate.

Attention now turns to Amdocs’ rivals; it will be interesting to see whether they are able to come up with a compelling solution.

Friday, July 10, 2015

Comptel Reference

3 Ireland, Ireland
AVEA, Turkey
BASE Company, Belgium - IL
COSMOTE, Greece
Deutsche Telekom, Germany
DNA Ltd, Finland
Elisa, Finland
Gibtelecom, Gibraltar
Hrvatski Telekom, Croatia
Hutchinson Drei, Austria
Kcell, Kazahkstan
KPN, The Netherlands
Liberty Global International
Magyar Telekom, Hungary
O2, Czech Republic
Orange, Romania
POST, Luxembourg
Proximus, Belgacom Mobile, Belgium
Slovak Telekom, Slovakia
SWIFT, Belgium
TDC Mobil, Denmark
Telefónica O2, Germany
Telefónica O2, UK
Telekom Romania Communications, Romania
Telenor, Norway - IL
TeliaSonera, Finland
TeliaSonera, Sweden
T-Mobile International, Germany
T-Mobile, Czech Republic
UPC Broadband Operations, The Netherlands
Vodafone, Ireland
Vodafone, Italy
Vodafone, Romania
Ziggo, The Netherlands
AXTEL, Mexico
Bahamas Telecom BTC, Bahamas
Caribbean Cellular Telephone Ltd, British Virgin Islands
Claro, Argentina
Claro, Colombia
Claro, Ecuador
Claro, Paraguay
Claro, Peru
Claro, Uruguay
Digitel, Venezuela
NET, Brazil
SETAR, Aruba
Telecom Personal, Argentina
Telefonica Colombia, Colombia
Telefonica de Argentina, Argentina
Telefonica de Chile, Chile
Telefonica Moviles, Argentina
Telefonica Moviles, Costa Rica
Telefonica Moviles, El Salvador
Telefonica Moviles, Guatemala
Telefonica Moviles, Nicaragua
Telefonica Moviles, Panama
Telefonica Moviles, Uruguay
Telesur, Surinam
T-Mobile, USA
2 degrees, New Zealand
AIS, Thailand
Banglalink, Bangladesh
Bharti Airtel, India
CamGSM, Cambodia
Chorus, New Zealand
Chunghwa Telecom, Taiwan
CSL, Hong Kong
CTM, Macau, China
Dialog Axiata, Sri Lanka
DIGI, Malaysia
DTAC, Thailand
Enable, New Zealand
FarEasTone, Taiwan
Globe Telecom, Philippines
Grameenphone, Bangladesh
Idea Cellular Limited, India
Indosat, Indonesia
Mobifone, Vietnam
Mobile One, Singapore
NBNCo, Australia - IL
New World Telecommunications, Hong Kong
OPT, New Caledonia
Optus Business Services, Australia
PCCW, Hong Kong
Real Move, Thailand
Robi Axiata, Bangladesh
Smart, Philippines
SmarTone, Hong Kong
StarHub, Singapore
Tata Teleservices, India
Telecom New Zealand
Vinaphone, Vietnam
Vodafone Essar, India
Vodafone, Australia - EL
Vodafone, New Zealand
CellC, South Africa
Inwi, Morocco
Maroc Telecom, Morocco
Meditel, Morocco
Mobilink, Pakistan
Mobily, Saudi Arabia
Omantel, Oman
Ooredoo, Algeria
Ooredoo, Oman
Ooredoo, Qatar
Ooredoo, Tunisia
Orascom Telecom Algérie (Djezzy)
Orascom Telecom Holding SAE, Egypt
PTCL, Pakistan
Sabafon, Yemen
STC, Saudi Arabia - IL
Sudanese Telecom Company Ltd (Sudatel), Sudan
Wataynia, Kuwait
Zain, Jordan
Zain, Kuwait

Tuesday, June 30, 2015

Release OSS Network Design and Template v1.0

1. ATM/Frame Relay Network Template
2. DLC Network Template
3. DSL Network Template
4. Ethernet Network Template
5. Fiber-based Broadband Delivery Network Template
6. IP Network Template
7. Optical/TDM Network Template
8. SONET/SDH Network Template
9. Wireless Network Template
10. Cable TV Network Template
11. Consumer VoIP Network Template
12. GSM 3GPP Network Template
13. L2 VPN Network Template
14. Metro Ethernet Network Template
15. MPLS L3 VPN Network Template

Tuesday, June 9, 2015

Wednesday, May 13, 2015

B/OSS Transformation & Systems Integration at Saudi Telecom Company

An Analyst's Prejudices
When you peer up at the stars on a moonless night, what do you see? Do you gaze up with wonder at the heavenly chaos? Or do you immediately do a visual google of the skies to spot the Big Dipper?
It's a shame isn't it? We look first for the constellations -- and not for the stars. Centuries of socially-inherited training have taught us what's there to "see". Makes you wonder what the night sky would look like if we could erase everything we ever learned about Betelgeuse and Orion. Perhaps that's what Vincent Van Gogh was after in his painting, Starry Night.
Now, when it comes to blindly following the mind's well-trodden paths, telecom analysts are as guilty as everybody else. And one prejudice I'm sure I share with my analyst brethren is a tendency to see the B/OSS market from a software vendor's perspective. And that should come as no surprise given the money software vendors spend to educate and influence analysts.
But recognize: it's a big prejudice, especially in B/OSS because the role of software is only one aspect of its larger implementation success at the telecoms.
In fact, software and hardware -- by themselves -- shouldn't properly be called "systems" at all. For only when these tools are combined with smart people and wise business processes does a true B/OSS system really exist.
And this is precisely where systems integrators (SIs) step in to perform their magic. Yet, it's curious. When you look at telecom publications, conferences, and other industry media, you notice that SIs don't get very much coverage. Which prompts the question: if the SIs are so critical to B/OSS success, where are the detailed case studies, magazine articles, speeches, and trade show booths to back it all up?

Sid Hoosein
There are many reasons why the SIs don't have a strong public presence and among them are: client confidentiality, competitive secrecy, poor marketing, and the difficulty of explaining a complex B/OSS engagement in a magazine article.
Suffice it to say: the SIs and consultants are hugely influential, but their story remains largely untold. And this is precisely why I'm pleased to present this interview with Sid Hoosein, who recently spent 15 months as a program/project manager for Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) implementing a major B/OSS overhaul at Saudi Telecom Company (STC).
You'll find here a highly interesting exposé of the complexities involved in integrating B/OSS at large carriers. The point of Sid's message is clear: implementing a large scale B/OSS is far more than getting your GUIs and XML tables right.  And the views Sid expresses are strictly his own opinions and don't reflect the views of TCS or Saudi Telecom:

About Saudi Telecom Company
Dan Baker (TRI): Sid, can you give us a little backgrounder on what sent you to the Middle East? And please fill us in on the client, Saudi Telecom.
Hoosein: Dan, Saudi Telecom Company (STC), the dominant telecom operator in Saudi Arabia has grown leaps and bounds in the past few years. In some ways, it is very backward, but in other ways it is very advanced. Their operations are highly automated, but they are inflexible and are in need of a major overhaul. Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) hired me to live in Saudi Arabia and assist the local SI team as their Director of Business Interfaces. It turned out to be a highly interesting assignment.
Saudi Arabia was not what I expected. The country is highly urbanized and has a population of 27 million -- only 6 million less than Canada. Much of the population is concentrated in a few cities such as Riyadh and Jeddah. The STC campus is in Riyadh and a large portion of the STC staff is based in Riyadh.
STC, with an annual revenue of $12 billion and 21,000 employees has become a Tier 1 carrier, close to the size of KPN. The operator is practically the sole provider of landlines in the Kingdom and it has the largest market share by far in wireless too, competing against Mobily and Zain.
What drove the project was STC's goal to become far more customer-centric. And to that end, it's undergone some big reorganizations. As a result, it's had to re-engineer many of its systems to fit the new organization structure and market environment.

Systems Integrator and B/OSS Players
TRI: Who were some of the B/OSS vendor players involved at Saudi Telecom Company?
Hoosein: STC's end-to-end order-to-cash system that was built around ICMS, an integrated B/OSS system IBM implemented for STC in the mid-90s. The software is highly customized and has worked quite well for STC, but it was time to replace this with something more modern.
Tata Consultancy Services was the chosen systems integrator for the project. In customer care, STC opted for an Oracle Siebel CRM and the billing piece was awarded to Convergys' Infinys Rating and Billing. Granite from Telcordia was chosen on the inventory side. There are a number of other B/OSS vendor systems involved, but the SI project included implementation of these three completely new software systems.

Reorganization and Data Migration Issues
TRI: You mentioned that reorganization was the catalyst for B/OSS system changes. But what were some of the specific organization challenges faced?
Hoosein: STC is organized into four business units (BUs): residential landline, wireless consumer, enterprise, and wholesale. The first challenge was to come up with an enterprise-wide customer segmentation scheme. And moving in that direction entailed a big shake up over who actually "owned the customer" and associated data.
Historically each business unit had its own systems with its customer codes, customer types, product and service codes and other data such as codes for enquiry, complaints and order types in the Call Centers. The data models in each business unit were different. However, implementing a company-wide CRM and Billing System with a 360 degree view required a single data model for STC's customers both for the Call Center and the Billing System.
Conceiving such a data model was relatively easy. The hard part was actually implementing it, for there had to be agreement on customer ownership and segmentation across Business Units.
Once that was decided, you had the added challenge of mapping the legacy data into the new data model. In addition, the codes for different data attributes were often defined vaguely or undocumented and only certain individuals in the Business Support groups had the relevant information for data mapping.
As a result, data migration became a technical nightmare.
Another issue that needed company-wide agreement was customer treatment policy. Since any STC customer can be both a landline customer and a wireless customer, the credit policies from the different business units could not be different for the same customer. Often, there were no written policies and it was left upto individuals in the marketing department within the BU to come up with the policies that often varied from day to day.

Phased Implementation Approach
TRI: Sounds like it was a major feat getting all four business units to move in the same direction. How did the actual implementation go?
Hoosein: The term "implementation" implies you have a straight line path from A to Z. Nothing could be further from the truth. There were several projects under way when the SI arrived on the scene and it was up to the SI to implement several overlapping phases.
The TCS project started with the contract awarded for overhauling the Personal (Wireless) Business Unit systems, as this is an important part of STC's business and is a large chunk of the overall revenues. However, the award for Home and Enterprise (mostly landline) System came a year later. And to complicate matters further, the network organization had an ongoing project to implement the inventory system including Fiber to the Home (FTTH). The timeframes for the award of these projects were all different and stretched over a few years.
The cutover for the Personal BU itself was a challenge requiring deployment and testing in different regions, let alone cutting over any systems across different Business Units. Unfortunately, much of business and technical decisions already made by the Personal Business were not suitable for the Home and Enterprise Business Units. Implementing the 360 view in the Call Centers that works across Business Units also turned out to be a big challenge, thanks to on-going changes and differences in opinions as to what the 360 degree view looked like.
We would have loved having a steady goal to shoot for. Instead each phase became a moving target.

Number Management System Challenge
TRI: Was there a particular area of the project that caused more pain that other areas? What were the dynamics involved?
Hoosein: I'm not sure there was one particular area that caused more pain. Certainly the Number Management System (NMS) was a choke point in the project. The NMS was first implemented for wireless. The problem was that the complexity of NMS needed on the landline side was an order of magnitude greater than in wireless.
The NMS is tied closely to network inventory where number assignment was based on customer location and the central office switch that served the customer. But what TCS had developed for wireless had to be greatly enhanced for landline use. A tug-of-war eventually ensued between TCS - the integrator, and Telcordia who had the network inventory piece. Eventually it was decided that the NMS developed by TCS would be replaced involving major system changes and rework.

B/OSS Customization
TRI: What areas in the B/OSS required customization of the plain vanilla software to meet STC's needs?
Hoosein: Many customizations were required, actually. And much of it had to do with Saudi Arabia's unique culture and market dynamics.
Thirty percent of the population is made up of expats or foreign workers from counes like India, China, Egypt and the Philippines. What's more, these workers have special telecommunications needs for international calling and other services including money transfer. Prepaid is big with the expat population. Also STC has extensive processes around blacklisted customers, credit checks, discount, and dunning procedures.
Another peculiar market dynamic is the annual pilgrimage to Mecca. The Hajj season brings an influx of two to three million pilgrims into Saudi Arabia. Serving the telecom needs of these pilgrims is very lucrative for STC, but has wide implications for the B/OSS. For example, you have unique connects and disconnect rules for the pilgrims. And that translates to special rules for customer care, order handling, provisioning, activation and deactivation.
Another special requirement was around customer segmentation. For instance, privileged customers such as members of the royal family and other government officials require different customer treatments.

People and Program Management Issues
TRI: What about the people and program management side of B/OSS implementation? What challenges did you see there?
Hoosein: The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is very conservative. All foreigners have to abide by the rules and the local customs. The clerics are powerful and can impose severe punishment on any individual that violates these rules, so living and working in Saudi Arabia is a challenge for westerners and others.
The SI project is people intensive. I was surprised at the army of people TCS brought in for the project and they included every job title you can imagine: Business Analysts, Solution Architects, Siebel and IRB product experts, strong Program Management Office (PMO) staff, Business Process Reengineering (BPR) professionals, Data Migration professionals, Hardware engineers and other specialized and skilled professionals. Except for the BPR professionals that were mostly Egyptian nationals, most of these people were from India. I was the only American.
With all these people on the ground in the STC campus, personnel, program and project management was enormously complex. On paper, the Project Plan filled thousands of lines of Microsoft Project items. In reality, what the PMO managed was chaos.
Once again there were many unique constraints. For example, coordinating entering and leaving Saudi Arabia had to be done in step with the needs of the project. TCS used full-time personnel just to manage the Visas of their employees. And often Visas for key personnel were rejected. For instance, the Saudi Consulate with its fickle rules and regulations for Indian citizens made resource management very difficult. During the Hajj season, it was impossible to bring in any new personnel.
Then there were the language and other cultural issues.
People used to the informal work style of Europe and North America faced a bit of culture shock because business meetings with Saudis often entailed elaborate rituals with special protocols. For example, to set up a meeting, an STC employee in the IT organization had to send an official meeting notice to the STC employee in the business organization.
Working the internal politics was as daunting a task as it must be at any large carrier.
The interworking of different groups were based on personal relationships amongst the Saudis and usually based on quid pro quo. I dare say, even a savvy politician like Obama would be challenged to get things done at a large carrier like this because there are so many interest groups to please.

Conclusion
TRI: Sid, thanks for your wonderful insights on the challenges of implementing a B/OSS at a major carriers. Your final thoughts?
Hoosein: We spoke about many B/OSS implementation issues, but I feel I've only scratched the surface. I've gone away from this experience with great respect for systems integrators like TCS who've made major investments and commitments in a market that requires new skills. But after all, that's what problem solvers always do. They take tough problems and turn them over, for the flipside of a problem is often an opportunity.

Sid Hoosein Bio
Sadique "Sid" Hoosein has extensive experience in the telecom industry. Sid held a number of positions at Telcordia Technologies between 1986 and 2001 spanning market analysis, business development, and product management. In his last position at Telcordia, Sid was responsible for Telcordia's offerings in the Customer Care and Billing arena.
Since 2001 Sid has consulted with or held positions with a number of BSS/OSS companies such as Amdocs, Convergys, Telarix, Ventraq (formerly Acecomm) and others. In his most recent assignment at Tata Consultancy Services, Sid was posted in Saudi Arabia and was a member of the leadership team for a large scale project for implementing the next generation BSS/OSS. Sid was responsible for business process reengineering and for validating requirements for CRM, Order Management, Inventory and Billing. He interfaced with many organizations and business units at Saudi Telecom Company for this project.
Sid has an MBA from the University of Michigan, an MS in Operations Research from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and a BS in Mechanical Engineering from the Indian Institute of Technologies in Mumbai, India.

Saturday, May 2, 2015

05. Web Sales Services

04. Service Delivery Landscape

03. Consumer Segment Overview

02. Billing Landscape

01. MVNO Platform Overview

05. Top ups Summary

04. SIM,Number,Voucher Management Summary

03. Provisioning Workflow and Interfaces Summary

02. Customer Management Summary

01. Basic Interconnect and National Roaming Summary

Alcatel, Portal, Comptel Solution Design - Requirement

Alcatel, Portal, Comptel Solution Design - Mobile Number Portability

Alcatel, Portal, Comptel Solution Design - Introduction

Cramer Workstream

Cramer RFP Summary

Cramer Project Overview

Cramer Modeling

Cramer Best Practice Summary

Network Planning - 03. Business Process

Network Planning - 02. Solution Architecture

Network Planning - 01. Deliverables

Network Planning - Project Summary

AXIOSS Provisioning Summary

Friday, March 6, 2015

NBN Co buys Comptel code for OSS project

NBN Co's operations support system architecture has started to take shape after acquiring software and services from Finnish vendor Comptel and the project's systems integrator IBM.

Comptel revealed overnight that it would deliver fulfillment software for the NBN Co OSS "in collaboration with partner Alcatel-Lucent".

"This is a major agreement with a new customer," the vendor said in a statement, adding that the contract would run over multiple years.

"NBN Co will use Comptel's catalog-driven fulfillment solution, including logical and service inventory and service lifecycle management, to ensure wholesale services are delivered fast and efficiently on the network to the retail channels.

"The solution will support the delivery of IP services on the ground-breaking broadband network NBN Co are currently deploying."

NBN Co said last month that its BSS/OSS project would involve "other subcontractors and a range of software providers". Comptel was the first vendor to publicly emerge from that process.

Comptel touted "open interfaces and standards" as a key differentiator for its product – something NBN Co may have considered to be of value, considering its plans to piece together OSS and BSS systems and integrate them with other business systems such as enterprise resource planning (ERP).

Last month, NBN Co named IBM Australia as the prime systems integrator for the network builder's three-year $200 million operational and business support systems project.

IBM appears to be adding its own technology elements to support NBN Co's OSS mix.

NBN Co is on the hunt for a "dedicated Netcool specialist" which would report to the Head of OSS development.

Netcool is part of IBM's network management stack. The technology was acquired from Micromuse for US$865 million in 2005.

The job advertisement indicated that Netcool had been "deployed" at NBN Co's network surveillance operations centre (NSOC) in Docklands, Melbourne.

The NSOC was expected to be formally opened later this month, although staff have been using the facility since March.

Further comment was being sought from NBN Co.

Optus kicks off $400m billing and customer care overhaul project

OPTUS will spend about $400 million on a massive IT transformation project that would see the No 2 telco undertake a radical overhaul of its billing and customer care systems.

The Australian understands that the SingTel-owned telco has enlisted IT systems integrator Amdocs to help with the two-year project which, in addition to internal staffing costs, would cost between $300m and $400m.

The project — known inside Optus as BCC, for Billing and Customer Care — would see the telco untangle its snake’s nest of billing systems, shut down scores of legacy IT systems and unify its customer care functions across its mobile, fixed-line and HFC cable networks.

“We’re undertaking a huge transformation of our core IT systems over the next two years which will use the same platform across Singapore and Australia,” Optus chairman Paul O’Sullivan told The Australian.

“It’s designed to allow us to take things to the next level. It will give us the ability to deliver one or two-click functionality on the screen, the ability to apply analytics to do smart things. So if for example a (person) uses X amount of data when travelling overseas we can automatically recommend a pack that has that much data.”

If successful, the project would migrate Optus’s retail, business, enterprise and government customers and services across the telco’s various networks onto a single platform. This would provide the telco with a single customer view and generate cost savings as hundreds of legacy systems are switched off.

“We want to redesign the core processes in an Apple type of way so our customers get a wow factor when dealing with us. We are working to (see) how we automate and how we digitise it,” Mr O’Sullivan said.

The project, however, will come with huge risks and Optus management will be watching closely to ensure it does not follow Telstra’s botched rollout of its multi-billion-dollar Siebel billing system, which suffered regular crashes and led to case of double billing when first implemented.

Telstra’s technology transformation ultimately blew its budget by more than $1 billion, and caused problems for staff who had to deal with frequent software crashes and error provisioning.

Like Optus, Telstra’s IT transformation was designed to simplify its system architecture and product platform to improve customer experience. But in reality, deadlines slipped, costs increased and the platform did not deliver the full scope of what was expected.

Optus’s IT overhaul will face similar risks as the telco looks to decommission old billing systems and hundreds of legacy mobile and broadband plans that are no longer sold in the market.

“These projects are easy to talk about but they are a nightmare to execute,” said an Optus source with knowledge of the project but who asked to remain anonymous.

“There’s always a big risk with these projects that as you shut down legacy systems you might leave customers without service. This will be one of Optus’s top three operational risks over the next five years.”

The BCC project is part of Optus’s “Future Back” strategy, a plan to elevate the telco as the best customer service company in the nation. The Future Back strategy is supported by three pillars: the transformation of its back end IT systems; improved customer service; and moves to more subscription-based pricing plans for its services.

Monday, January 19, 2015

Billing Vendor M&A

NetCracker buy Convergys
Comverse buy Kenan
CSG buy Intec
CSG sell Kenan
Ericssion buy LHS BSCS
Oracle buy Portal

NetCracker
http://www.netcracker.com/
http://www.netcracker360.com/

Ericsson
http://www.ericsson.com/oss-bss/
http://www.ericsson.com/oss-bss/blog/
http://www.ericsson.com/ourportfolio/products/operations-and-business-support

Sunday, January 4, 2015

Service on IMS

IMS는 "IP Multimedia Subsystem"의 약자입니다. IP망에서 멀티미디어를 유통시키는 그런 하위시스템(subsystem)이라는 느낌이 확 오지요. 그러면 반 이상 감 잡은 겁니다. IMS가 그거니까요. "그러면 기존에 유튜브나 음악파일들은 모두 IMS망에서 전달되는 거냐?"라고 바로 반문하실 겁니다. 네 물론 그건 아닙니다. 왜냐하면 IMS는 기존의 IP통신과는 달리 통신사업자에 의해 잘 관리된 IP망으로써, 통신사업자의 서비스로 만들 수 있고, 그래서 과금도 가능한 네트웍을 말합니다. 
IMS를 얘기하면서 설명하기 좋은 서비스가 VoIP입니다. 아시다시피 VoIP가 등장하면서 IP망을 통해, 국제전화, 시외전화가 다 무료(IP구간)로 되었습니다. 이 얘기는 다시말하면 멀티미디어의 한 요소인 오디오(음성)가 망에서 통신회사의 컨트롤하에 잘 전달되게 되었다는 얘기입니다. 그런데 초기 VoIP라는 놈은 소프트스위치(Softswitch, 줄여서 SSW라고 씀)기반이었습니다.
이 당시, 전화국 안에 들어가면 한두개층은 빼곡히 쫙 늘어진 교환기들이 들어서 있었습니다. (삼성전자, LG전자, 대우통신, 한화통신등이 TDX같은 국산 교환기를 만들어 냈었죠) 즉 교환기는 각 가정과 사무실에 물린 전화선이 최종적으로 물리는 장치를 말합니다.
각 회선들이 전부다 몰리는 장치이니, 얼마나 회선들이 많이 붙겠습니까? 물론 1:1로 물리지는 않습니다. 멀티플렉싱이란 기술을 이용하여(집선이라고 부릅니다) 좀 모아서 연결을 하지만 여전히 많은 회선들이 연결되었었습니다.
그런데 IP망 즉 패킷망(1:1식으로 회선 연결하는 것에 대비하여 쓰는 말이죠)으로 전환되면서, 그런 회선들이 자리를 잃게 됩니다. 즉 이더넷 하나에 수천명이 아니 수만명의 회선이 물릴 수 있게 된 것입니다. 음성 교환도 SW적으로 처리하다보니, 예전의 장비모습도 그냥 컴퓨터로 변모합니다. 그렇게 변모한게 소위 소프트스위치인거죠.
즉 7,80년대 전화국에 가면 놓여있던 커다란 교환기가 IP망을 사용하면서 소프트웨어로 바뀐형태를 말합니다.

[다시 IMS로 돌아와서...]
그리고 이 SSW라는 놈을 아주 확장성있게 만든게 IMS입니다. 확장성있게 만들다보니, CSCF, HSS, MGCF, AS 등으로 나눠집니다. 이들과 관련하여 프로토콜 측면에서 아주 중요한 것 한가지는 IMS가 세션을 잘 처리한다는 것 + 이를 위해 SIP를 사용한다는 것 정도입니다.
위의 그림은 좀 복잡하지만, 간략하게 표시하면 아래 그림처럼 됩니다. IMS를 기반으로 존재하는 통신망의 차이를 단일화하고, 서비스를 일관성있게 제공한다 뭐 그런정도라고나 할까요.
그런데 아직까지도 IMS라는 말이 감이 잘 안올겁니다. 사실 일반인들은 교환기라는 것도 사실 생소합니다. 그래서 IMS를 접근하는 방식을 서비스로 잡아서 기술하려고 글을 시작했습니다.
제가 미리 던질 수 있는 질문에는 다음과 같은 세가지가 있습니다.

왜 요새는 IMS라는 말이 좀 시들었는가?
저마다 통신의 미래는 IMS라고 외치던 통신회사들, 그런데 사용자에게 달라진 것은 무엇인가? IMS에서는 도대체 어떤 서비스를 받을 수 있는가?

[왜 요새는 IMS라는 말이 좀 시들었는가?]
IMS는 기본적으로 SIP라는 프로토콜을 근간으로 하고 있으며, Telco의 입장에서 주도적으로 그려진 그림입니다. 다시 말해 통신사업자가 주도권을 쥐고, 새로운 통신 서비스들을 쉽게 쉽게 창출해 낼 수 있도록, 단순히 창출이 아니라, 통신회사입장에서는 그것들을 잘 과금(돈을 회수)까지 할 수 있도록 만든 구조입니다.
그런데 통신사업자들의 속성이 그러하듯, 변화가 너무 느렸습니다. 제 생각에는 2006년이나 7년에 표준도 잘 정립되고 IMS기반 톡톡튀는 서비스들이 몇개라도 나왔다면 지금같지는 않았을 거라 생각합니다. IMS는 안으로 들어가보면 위에 망구성만큼이나 스펙이 꽤나 복잡합니다. 게다가 SSW+AS(어플리케이션 서버)의 조합에 비해 차별화된 서비스들이 나와 있지도 않습니다.
다시 언급하는데 통신사위주의 움직임이 너무 느렸습니다. 저 역시 개방형통신에 빠져서, Palay 문서를 보고, RI(Reference Implementation)을 읽어 본적이 있습니다. 정말 이런 게 제대로 먹히면 통신시장은 확달라지겠구나라고 생각했었는데, 통신시장은 기대와 달리 꿈쩍도 않더군요. 통신사들은 저마다 자기의 기존시스템(Legacy)이 있어서, API를 뽑아줘도 이들과 맞추는 작업이 얼마나 힘든지 모릅니다
반면, 웹과 모바일환경의 변화가 너무 빨랐습니다. 스마트폰 앱스토어를 보세요. 들어가서 사용할 서비스가 정말 얼마나 많습니까? IP세계로 오면서 커뮤니케이션에 있어서 통신사의 의존도는 점점 줄어들고 있습니다.
제 블로그(오른쪽 옆)에 붙은 공짜 문자 보내기를 보십시오. 거기에 글만 쓰면 공짜로 제게 문자를 날릴 수 있습니다. 이런 부분은 기존에는 Telco를 거치지 않고는 불가능하다고 생각했던 부분인데, 하나둘씩 빗장이 열리고 있습니다. 모바일 VoIP 솔루션들을 써보십시오. Nimbuzz, Fring, Skype등 모두 Telco의 국제전화 수익을 갉아먹고 있습니다. 텔코는 IMS 윗단에서 제대로 된 킬러앱을 내지 못하면 도태될 겁니다. (사실은 IMS가 되었든, 다른 뭐시기가 되었든 킬러앱이 절실합니다)


[IMS이후, 사용자에게 달라진 것은 무엇인가?]
VoIP 즉 인터넷을 통해 전화를 하게 되었다는 것만이 현재 킬러앱입니다. 그 외에는 IMS에 이렇다할 어플이 없는 상태입니다. 나온 것들이 좀 있긴 했었지만, 별로 주목받지 못했습니다. 그래서 더이상 IMS가 힘을 못받고 있는 것이기도 하죠. (전화관련된 서비스예: 멀티미디어 컬러링, MCID, PTT 등)
결국에 사용자 관점에서는 IMS이후로(사실은 IMS이전 버전인 소프트스위치로도 충분한 구조) 인터넷 전화가 도입되어 전화좀 싸게 할 수 있게 되었다 정도입니다. 그다지 혁신적으로 달라진 것은... 글쎄요. 제 눈에는 보이지 않는군요.


[IMS에서는 도대체 어떤 서비스를 받을 수 있는가?]
바로 앞에서 서비스가 보이지 않는다면서 어떤 서비스를 받을 수 있는가 질문에 답한다는 게 좀 역설적입니다. 아마도 설명드릴 서비스가 기존에도 되던 서비스처럼 들릴 수도 있습니다. 왜냐하면 여러번 반복해서 말씀드렸듯이 IMS 킬러앱이 없어서 그렇습니다. 하지만 없는 것을 창조할 수는 없고, 어찌되었든 IMS 망에서 어플리케이션 서비스를 제공하는 업체 하나를 마루타로 들어서 설명하고자 합니다.
그 업체는 uReachTechnologies라는 회사구요. 해당 서비스에 대한 소개는 2부에서 진행하도록 하겠습니다.

어쨋든 uReach가 IMS 컴패터블하게 제공한다는 서비스들은 아래와 같은 것이 있습니다.

Auto Attendant
한글로 자동중계대라고 하더군요. 저는 처음에 무슨 군대나 방송관련 용어인줄 알았습니다. 그러나 저희 회사들어오고 나서 자동중계대가 Auto attendant를 의미한다는 것을 알게 되었습니다. 여기서 제공한는 기능은 이런 건데요. 이미 다들 소비자입장에서 경험을 해보신 적이 있을겁니다.
음성사서함: 전화했을때, 전화못받으면 알아서 전화국에서 저장해주는 거죠. 우리나라에는 별로 인기가 없다는 바로 그 서비스입니다. (미국은 이 서비스 활용을 많이 하더군요. 역시 문화의 차이), 음성 내용은 인터넷으로 접속하면 파일로 다운로드도 되고요, 당근 PC에서 들을 수도 있습니다. 전화에서 들을 순 없냐고 물으시는 분은 안계시겠죠?
Multi-Extension Call Director: 콜센타를 운영하는 기업들에서 들어오는 전화를 효과적으로 잘 배분되게 하는 것입니다. 보통 기업들은 이런 서비스를 위해 컨택트센타 시스템을 구성하는데 (돈 무지 많이 듭니다), 이것을 알아서 통신사에서 처리할 수 있는거죠. 이를테면 전화가 오면 ARS가 일단 받고, 이것을 적합한 상담 부서로 돌리되, 통화중인 아닌 적당한 사람에게로 전달한다던지 하는 것...
웹기반 관리툴: 사실 들어오는 전화를 어떤 방식으로 전달하고, 배분할 것이냐는 회사의 정책에 따른 것이고, 그 구성은 회사마다 다를 수 있습니다. 이것을 웹에 들어가서 손쉽게 할 수 있게 해줍니다.
Fax 수신: 팩스를 어떤 방법(이메일, 프린터, 팩스기계 등등)으로 받을 것인지 결정할 수 있습니다. Unified Messaging mailbox라는 놈이 있는데 그놈이 팩스기계처럼 팩스를 받아줄 수 있다는 거죠. 그런다음 메일로 보내든, 프린터로 보내든
유선전화, 이동전화, 웹(소프트폰) 등 여러가지 형태로 전화를 받을 수 있습니다.


Single Number Service
Find Me/Follow Me : 뭐 간단히 얘기하자면 전화번호를 몇개 설정해두고, 내선번호, 휴대폰, 집전화 순으로 등록하는 겁니다. 그리고 한놈씩 제한된 횟수만큼 안울리면 다른 번호로 넘어가게 하는 거죠. 자신이 전화가 많은 사람이라면, 필요가 있을텐데 글쎄요... (제 경우에도 집전화, 회사 유선전화, 이동전화 2개... 집전화만 빼고 대부분 착신전환 시켜놓고 아이폰 하나로 다 받고 있습니다)
스케쥴링: 위의 전화 라우팅을 날짜를 두고 하는 거겠죠. 평일날은 어떤 경우든 나에게 전화가 오게 하고, 주말은 쉬는 모드로 설정한다던지 등
Call Screening: 누구 누구의 전화는 안받겠다는 거죠. 스토커 방지용
데스크탑 매니저: 전화랑 메신저 합쳐졌다고 하면 가장 빠르게 이해될 겁니다. 누군가로 부터 채팅 요구가 아니라, 전화가 오면 알아서 컴퓨터 화면에 뜨는 겁니다. 보통 PC용 소프트폰들도 전화번호를 하나씩 따로 받게 되는데, 이 것은 자신의 사내전화로 누군가 전화하면 전화기 벨이 울릴 수도 있고, 아니면 PC의 매니저가 울려줄 수도 있습니다. 그러면 거기서 바로 발신자 정보를 보고 적당한 대응을 하게 해주는 거죠. 일반적인 콜센타 CRM에서 쓰는 기법이지요.
TV 통신 매니저: 전화오면 TV에 뜨고, 거기서 전화 핸들링할 수 있게 해준거라고 보면됩니다. 어떤 TV에서 되는지는 아직 모르겠구요. 아마도 미국내 IPTV중에서도 몇개 되는 곳이 한정되어 있겠지요.
Meet Me Conferencing: 회의전화 설정하는 것입니다. 시간 설정이 주요한 거겠지요.
Personalized Ring Tones: 발신자에 따라 전화벨소리 바꾸는 것 말합니다. 제가 아는 사람은 회사동료한테 오는 전화는 싸이렌이 울리고, 집전화는 일반 음악이 울리게 해두었다고 하는 군요. 이렇듯이 그룹별로 음원을 설정하는 것... 전 이렇게 부지런하지 못합니다.

Personal Media Manager
전화, SMS, MMS 등으로 온 문자, 사진, 동영상 등등을 저장 관리할 수 있는 솔루션입니다.
웹에서도 접근가능하고, 이것들을 페이스북이나 블로그로 내보낼 수도 있다. (FB Connect)
아 이건 막강하네요. 전화기록이나, SMS, MMS 사진같은 것들을 다른 웹서비스들과 연동시킨다는 것! 요런 서비스는 저도 아직 써보지 못한 겁니다.
uReach에서는 이메일, MMS, RSS 피드, 위젯 등등과의 연결 채널을 만들 수도 있다고 합니다.
결국 자신이 텔레포니에서 습득한 미디어를 SNS(FB, My Space)로 공유하게 해주었다는 것인데, 국내에도 조만간 이런 서비스를 시도하리라 생각합니다. 아참, 제가 작년에 미국 시카고에서 열리는 SuperComm에 다녀왔는데요. 전화와 페이스북의 연결은 아주 기본이 되어 버린 것 같습니다. 미국내 SSW 1위인 Sonus에 갔었는데 거기서도 SNS연결을 얘기하더군요.
갑자기 든 의문: 근데 아이폰 쓰게 되니까, MMS 같은 거 거의 안쓰게 되요. SMS도 트위터같은 것들때문에 좀 줄어들고요.

Unified Messaging
이 회사가 제품을 이러 저리 모양만 바꿔 다시 소개하는 것 같은 느낌입니다. 앞에 설명 드렸던 것들과 알고보면 비슷한 것들이어서요. 어쨋든 홈피에 나와있는 기능들을 보면
메시징: 음성사서함, 이메일, 팩스 이런 것들을 통합 관리해줍니다.
전화, 웹, 이동전화: 이런 것들도 웹을 통해 손 쉽게 관리해준다는 얘기겠지요.
Virtual Fax: 웹팩스라고 보심 될 것 같습ㄴ다. 파일이나 메일 문서를 바로 팩스로 보낼 수 있겠지요.
주소록과 캘린더: 이런 것들도 들어가 있습니다. 캘린더 기능인데, 생긴 모양이 구글캘린더와 비슷합니다. 근데 저처럼 이미 구글캘린더로 모든 것을 관리하는 사람이 과연 통신사에서 제공하는 캘린더로 갈아 탈까요? 저는 아니올시다라고 생각합니다.
멀티채널 노티기능: 무엇인가 메시지가 왔을때 이것을 한 곳으로 밀어서 노티해주는 기능입니다. 결국 SMS가 온 것을 이메일로 볼 수도 있고, 심지어 인스탄트 메신저에서 확인할 수도 있게 해준다는 것인데... 이게 말처럼 의미가 있을지 모르겠습니다. 여러분의 생각은?

Voice Messaging
자동중계대에서 설명한 것으로 갈음하겠습니다.
대신 uReach만의 독특한 게 있다면 음성메시지를 텍스트로, 텍스트 메시지(메일이나 SMS)를 음성메시지로 변환해주는 기능을 제공한다것 정도라고 생각합니다.
저는 이런 기능을 무지 기다렸던 사람으로서 한번 사용해보고 싶습니다. 작년에는 구글 Voice 나오면서 소개되었던 기능이기도 합니다. 아마도 우리말도 이런 기능을 만들어 넣는다면 품질이 어떨까 매우 궁금합니다.
음성변환이 되므로, 음성으로 명령을 내리는 기능들도 당연히 있습니다. ARS응답을 번호로 누르는 대신 말로 할 수 있겠지요. 1번 이라고 말하면 1번이 눌린 효과가 나타나는 거겠지요. 운전할때 필요할 수 있겠습니다만... 여전히 우리말도 이런 기능을 넣으면 어케될까 궁금합니다.

IMS FAQ

1. 최대 300 단어를 사용하여 IMS를 어떻게 설명하겠는가?

세대가 변해가면서, IMS (IP Multimedia Subsystem)라는 용어는 광범위한 의미를 가지게 되었다.  GSM 모바일 네트워크의 3G 진화를 위해서 표준을 개발하는 조직인 3GPP (3rd Generation Partnership Project)가 IMS를 원래 정의했다. 3GPP 릴리즈 5 (R5)에 IP를 통한 멀티미디어 통신을 지원하기 위한 방법으로 IMS 규격들이 처음으로 등장했다.
이런 문맥에서, “멀티미디어”는 음성을 포함한다. 그래서, 처음부터 새로운 멀티미디어 서비스들을 지원하는 것뿐만이 아니라, 전통적인 회선 스위칭 기반의 음성 텔레포니를 대체하기 위한 목적으로 IMS가 시장에 나왔다.

IMS의 주요한 기술적 특징은 CSCF (Call Session Control Function, 호 세션 제어 기능), 다른 식으로 소프트스위치 (softswitch)로서 알려진 컴포넌트의 관리하에서 개개의 IP 세션들을 설정하기 위해 SIP (Session Initiation Protocol)을 사용하는 것이다. 이것은 IMS가 IP의 QoS (Quality Of Service)를 보장해주고, 보안을 제공하고, 세션당 기준으로 과금을 지원하게 해준다.

오늘날 IMS라는 용어는 수 많은 방식으로 사용되고 있다. 때때로, IMS는 통신 사업자가 어떠한 종류의 SIP 인프라를 자신의 네트워크에 추가할 때도 사용되고, 때때로 IMS는 3GPP R5나 릴리즈 6 (R6) 규격을 따르는 장비를 실제로 구축하는 네트워크를 참조할 때도 사용된다. 물론, 어떠한 주요한 기술의 변화와 함께, 실제 구축하기에 앞서 과대 선전 광고의 사이클이 밖에서 판을 친다. 더 나아가서, 3GPP R5가 실제로 구축되기에 어렵게 했던 격차들을 3GPP R6가 채운 것처럼 IMS 규격들 그 자체가 계속 진화하고 있다. 그리고 나서, IMS는 차세대 유선 네트워크에 초점을 두고 있는 TISPAN과 케이블 사업자들과 자신들의 통신 이익에 초점을 두고 있는 CableLabs를 포함하여 다른 표준 단체들의 관심을 끌었다. 3GPP 릴리즈 7 (R7)은 모든 종류의 무선 및 유선 네트워크를 포함하도록 설계된 첫 번째 IMS를 나타낸다.


2. 이동 통신 사업자들에게 왜 IMS가 중요한가?

IMS 이전의 모바일 네트워크는 심지어 3G 비디오 텔레포니 (3G-324M)가 회선 스위칭 기반의 데이터 경로상에서 동작함에도 음성 위주였다. 그러나, 모바일 무선 기술이 광대역 데이터를 전송할 수 있을 정도의 대역폭에 이르기 시작했다. 만일 어떤 통신 사업자가 IP 기반의 서비스들을 지원하기로 움직이지 않는다면, 다른 통신 사업자들이 자신이 할 수 있는 한 최선을 다해서 대량의 인터넷 액세스를 사용하여 그러한 서비스들을 제공할 것이다.


3. 유선 통신 사업자들에게 왜 IMS가 중요한가?

모바일 및 VoIP의 시장 장악력이 점점 커지면서, 유선 통신 사업자들은 조이고 있다. 최소한 유선 통신 사업자들은 유선과 모바일의 융합 (FMC, Fixed-Mobile Convergence)을 지원할 필요가 있다. 그러나, 이상적으로 유선 통신 사업자들은 새로운 서비스들을 제공할 방법이 필요하다. IMS는 공공의 인터넷을 통한 VoIP가 제공할 수 없는 QoS를 보장하면서 새로운 서비스들을 지원할 잠재적인 능력을 가지고 있다.


4. 유선 및 무선 네트워크를 둘 다 가지고 있는 통신 사업자들에게 IMS는 더 중요한가?

IMS는 FMC를 지원하기 매우 좋은 방법이다. UMA (Unlicensed Mobile Access)와 같은 다른 접근 방법들이 있다. 그러나, 이러한 것들은 서비스 특정적인 것에 반하여, IMS는 수 많은 서비스들을 위한 일반적인 플랫폼이다.


5. IMS가 직면한 주요한 도전들에는 어떠한 것이 있는가?

첫 번째는 복잡하다는 것이다. 수도 없이 매우 많은 IMS 규격들이 있다. 또한 이것들은 계속해서 진화해서 수 많은 버전들이 있다. 그리고 상호 연동 테스트 또한 제품 소개 및 구축을 따라잡지 못하고 있다.
두 번째는 서비스들이다. IMS는 새로운 서비스들을 지원할 수 있는 플랫폼이다. 그러나, 통신 사업자는 서비스들이 시작하고 성공할 때까지 돈을 벌지 못한다. 오늘날, IMS를 이용하고 있는 새로운 서비스들의 개수는 상대적으로 매우 적은 편이며, 인터넷과 비교하여 개발자 생태계 또한 매우 작다.


6. IMS의 대안이 있는가?

주요한 경쟁 상대는 IP를 통하는 것과 혹은 공개 인터넷을 통해 직접 개발된 서비스들이다. 그러한 서비스들은 IMS가 제공하는 QoS에 의존할 필요가 없으며, 개발자들의 규모가 광대하다. 또한 IP가 제공하는 QoS를 항상 보장할 필요가 있는 것은 아니다.


7. 당신은 IMS의 현재 상태를 어떻게 이야기하겠는가?

오늘날 구축된 대다수의 “IMS” 들은 SIP 구성요소들 (IMS 표준을 따른 것 혹은 그렇지 않은 것)과 레거시(legacy) 네트워크들의 혼합 형태이다. 유선 네트워크들을 위한 IMS가 R7에서 시작되었기 때문에, 오늘날 유선 네트워크에서의 IMS는 IM (Instant Messaging)과 온/오프라인 상태 혹은 FMC처럼 새로운 애플리케이션들을 위한 몇몇 종류의 SIP 인프라에 덧붙여서 음성 회선을 제어하는 전형적으로 소프트스위치의 형태를 가진다.
크게 봤을 때, 진정한 의미의 IMS 네트워크가 구축되고 있다. 이러한 IMS 네트워크들은 현재 IM, FMC 그리고 비디오 공유 (sharing)와 같은 새로운 애플리케이션들을 위해서 사용되고 있다. 그러나 아직 기본적인 음성 전화를 위해서 사용되고 있지는 않다.


8. 전세계적으로 IMS를 구현하기 시작한 통신 사업자들에는 누가 있는가? IMS를 구현한 첫 번째 사업자들은 매우 큰 사업자들인가?

IMS의 능력이 서서히 전세계 주요한 네트워크와 여러 다른 네트워크에서, 예를 들면 중동에 있는 네트워크에서 보여지고 있다.


9. 표준화의 현재 상태는 어떠한가?

R7 규격들은 기능적으로 거의 다 확정이 되었으나, 여전히 공표되지는 않았다. 그리고 케이블 전화를 지지하는 IMS의 기능 향상과 같은 몇몇 아이템들이 릴리즈 8로 연기되었다. 전형적으로 안정된 규격에서 시작하여 상호 연동 테스트를 받을 수 있는 장비가 나오기까지 적어도 2년의 세월이 걸린다.


10. 당신은 IMS가 직면하고 있는 주요한 장애 요소가 표준화라고 생각하는가? 아니면 주목하지 않을 수 없는 애플리케이션들의 부족이라고 생각하는가?

주목하지 않을 수 없는 애플리케이션들, 즉 돈을 벌어주는 애플리케이션들이 가장 큰 이슈이다. 표준화와 상호 연동 테스트는 통신 사업자가 통신 장비를 구매하고자 할 때, 통신 사업자의 옵션들을 증가시킨다. 그러나, 결국에 가장 중요한 것은 단지 매출을 증가시킬 수 있는 그러한 새로운 애플리케이션들이다.


11. 릴리즈 7이 왜 그렇게 중요한가? 통신 사업자들은 IMS를 완전히 구축하기 위해서 릴리즈 7을 기다리고 있는가?

IMS R7은 모바일과 유선 네트워크 지원을 통합한 첫 번째 릴리즈이다. 또한, 뒤늦게 안 것이지만, R5는 불완전한 것으로 간주되었고 R6과 R7 사이에도 여러 개 주요한 것들 예를 들면, 정책 인프라에서와 같은 것들이 변했다. 이것은 R6으로 네트워크를 구축했다면, R7로 도달하기 위해 주요한 작업을 다시 해야만 한다는 것을 의미한다.


12. IMS가 현재 구축되어가고 있다, 통신 사업자들이 IMS로 완전히 옮겨가기까지 어느 정도의 시간이 걸릴 것인가?

IMS로 이동하는데, “지능망” (IN)이 지난 세대에서 했던 것과 유사하게 대략 10년 정도의 시간이 걸릴 것 같다. IMS와 IN은 비슷하게 복잡하다. 그리고 업계를 구성하는 것들 즉 벤더들, 통신 사업자들 및 표준 조직들도 또한 그래도 남아 있다. 그래서 IMS가 IN 보다 더 빠르게 일어날 것으로 보기는 힘들다.


13. IMS가 어떻게 사용자들에게 영향을 줄 것인가? 사용자들은 더 낮은 가격에 더 많은 서비스를 받을 것인가?

IMS가 수 많은 새로운 서비스들로 확장해 나갈 수 있는 지에 대한 것은 통신 사업자들이 제 3자 파트너 개발자에게 얼마나 개방적인지에 달려있다. 만일 통신 사업자들이 현재의 패턴대로 계속한다면, IMS는 지능망 (IN)이 했던 것과 똑같을 것이다. 즉 10년 후, IMS는 소수의 새로운 서비스들, 예를 들면 아마 10개 미만의 서비스들로 아주 널리 구축되어 사용되고 있을 것이다.

14. IMS가 가능한 모바일 단말기들이 얼마나 중요한가? 그러한 단말기들이 언제 이용 가능하다고 생각하는가?
IMS가 가능한 단말기들은 몇 개의 애플리케이션들, 예를 들면 IM (Instant Messaging)과 온/오프라인 상태를 보여주는 IMS 애플리케이션들에게 매우 중요하다. 다른 애플리케이션들은 IMS가 필요하지 않거나 혹은, IMS가 가능한 단말기가 부족해도 잘 동작할 수 있다.
IMS가 가능한 모바일 단말기들이 지금 막 시장에 나오고 있다. 그 중에서도 특히, NMS는 삼성과 같은 회사에 IMS 단말 클라이언트 소프트웨어를 제공하고 있는 회사이다. NMS의 IMS 소프트웨어를 탑재한 단말기들이 올해 초 일찍 시장에 선보이기 시작했다.


15. IMS가 HSPA에 어떻게 영향을 줄 것인가?

HSDPA와 HSUPA는 UMTS 네트워크에서 광대역 데이터 전송을 가능하게 해주는 무선 능력을 말한다. 그래서 기술적으로, HSPA는 상대적으로 IMS와 연관이 없다. 그러나, 경쟁적인 시장에서, HSPA의 이용 가능성은 하나 혹은 그 이상의 통신 사업자들이 정액 요금으로 광대역 인터넷 서비스를 제공할 것이다라는 전망을 증가시키고, 그것은 차례로 제 3자 파트너들이 모바일 네트워크들을 통한 인터넷 기반의 비 IMS 서비스들을 구현할 것이다라는 가망성 또한 증가시키고 있다

IMS Strategy in Korea

KTF가 3세대 이동통신(WCDMA/HSDPA)용 IP멀티미디어 서브시스템(IMS) 구축에 나서면서 차세대 네트워크 및 서비스 윤곽이 드러나고 있다. 약 100억원대로 추산되는 이번 프로젝트는 기지국에서부터 게이트웨이·미들웨어·서비스 애플리케이션 등 IP기반의 새로운 시스템 라인업 전반을 구축하게 되는 대규모 사업이다. 핵심 서비스로는 인스턴트 메신저(IM) 및 데이터 융합 등이 떠오르고 있다.
KTF는 오는 4분기 시범 서비스를 목표로 IMS 개발을 추진할 계획이다.
KTF의 IMS는 크게 코어망·이네이블러·단말 클라이언트의 세 분야로 나뉜다. 코어망으로는 교환기(CSCF)부터 미디어게이트웨이(MG·MGCF), 가입자위치 등록시스템(HLR)을 대체할 가입자정보관리시스템(HSS) 등이 구축되며 결제와 콘텐츠 관리 등을 수행할 미들웨어 개발도 병행된다. 이용자가 직접 체험할 수 있는 서비스 애플리케이션도 장비 구축과 동시에 개발될 예정이다.
KTF는 특히 3세대 이동통신의 장점을 살릴 수 있는 서비스가 IMS라고 보고, 신규 망을 전적으로 WCDMA 기반으로 구축한다는 전략이다. 또 애플리케이션 인터페이스(API)를 개방하고 플랫폼 모듈화도 단행해 기존 계층 구조 형태의 시스템도 보다 효율적으로 재편하기로 했다.
서비스의 핵으로 인스턴트메신저를 부각시킬 계획이다. HSDPA폰의 사용자 인터페이스(UI)를 재설계하고 핵심에 메신저를 두겠다는 전략. 검색과 영상서비스 등도 기본 UI에 포함시켜 사용자들이 보다 편리하게 데이터 서비스에 접근할 수 있게 할 계획이다. 관심을 끌었던 인터넷전화(VoIP)와 PoC(Push-to-talk over Cellular)는 이번 프로젝트에서는 제외될 가능성이 높다. 두 서비스 모두 IMS를 대표하는 것들이지만 기존 음성 서비스와 충돌할 뿐만 아니라 규제 이슈로부터 자유롭지 않을 것이라는 판단에서다.
이번 프로젝트는 차세대 서비스의 윤곽을 드러내준다는 점에서 SK텔레콤과 LG텔레콤 등 다른 이동통신 사업자들에게도 관심이 집중되고 있다. 또 시스템 공급사례를 확보할 좋은 기회라는 점에서 장비 및 솔루션업계의 관심도 뜨겁다. 이미 삼성전자·LG-노텔 등 장비 업계와 이루온·텔코웨어·브리지텍·뉴그리드테크놀러지 등 솔루션업체들이 컨소시엄을 구성하는 등 움직임이 활발하다.
KTF의 관계자는 “향후 주력이 될 HSDPA 서비스의 차별성을 부각시키기 위해 IMS를 적극 활용할 계획”이라며 “서비스 인터페이스 전반을 개편하는만큼 이용자도 더욱 편리한 데이터 서비스를 체험할 수 있을 것”이라고 말했다.

IMS 플랫폼을 기반으로 하는 SoIP는 메가 TV,와이브로와 함께 KT의 3대 전략 서비스 중 하나로 기존 VoIP가 단순 음성통화 뿐만 아니라 진화된 커뮤니케이션 및 정보, 엔터테인먼트 등 다양한 서비스를 고객이 쉽고 편리하게 이용할 수 있게 하는 확장된 개념의 서비스다


국내 통신사별 현황은
SKT는 EVDO 서비스부터 코어망에 IMS 일부 도입하였으며, IP 기반의 CSSF(대용량 교환기), PHSS(가입자 정보관리) 등을 구축중

KT는 BcN(Broadband Convergence Network)을 지원하는 IMS 인프라 구축함
다양한 융합 서비스 제공하고, 유선 전화 가입자와 이동전화 가입자간 화상통화/인스턴트 메신저 가능


단말기 현황은
LG전자(대표 김쌍수)는 정통부가 추진하는 IT839 신성장 과제 중 하나인 ‘IP멀티미디어 서브시스템(IMS:Multimedia Subsystem)단말 개발’ 프로젝트를 단독으로 수주, 차세대 IMS 단말기 개발에 본격 나섰다. 이에 따라 LG전자는 HSDPA와 더불어 차세대 핵심 정보통신 기술로 급부상중인 IMS 기술표준과 선행 솔루션을 미리 확보할 수 있는 유리한 고지를 차지하게 됐다.

6일 최진성 LG전자 이동통신기술연구소장은 “올해부터 2007년까지 3년 간 IMS 기반의 비동기식 WCDMA 단말기 개발을 진행하게 된다”며 “유럽 수출향 IMS 단말기 개발은 향후 모바일 애플리캐이션 시장에 일대 혁명을 가져다 줄 것”이라고 밝혔다.

IMS는 모든 정보통신 기기에 IP(Internet Protocal)를 부여, 유무선 환경을 통합하는 '올IP' 개념의 핵심 네트워크 기술로, 현재 PC에서 구현되는 인터넷 웹 브라우저와 같은 개념을 다양한 형태의 이동통신 기기에 접목하기 위한 기술이다.
LG전자는 올해부터 매년 정통부로부터 10억원의 연구개발비를 지원받아 GSM·GPRS·WCDMA 등 유럽 수출을 위한 듀얼모드 IMS단말기를 개발하게 된다.

현재 국내 SKT 등이 CDMA 기반의 IMS망 도입을 서두르고 있고 유럽 사업자들도 IMS망 구축에 상당한 투자를 하고 있어 이르면 오는 2007년 초 완벽한 IMS 플랫폼을 장착한 신제품이 상용화 될 전망이다.

LG전자가 주도하는 IMS 단말 개발 프로젝트가 완료되면 휴대폰 사용자들은 IMS 단말기를 통해 음성통화를 하면서 동시에 채팅 메시지를 전송할 수 있고 인스턴트 메시징을 하면서 그림이나 문자 등을 전송하는 등 멀티미디어 이동통신이 실현된다.

최 상무는 “지금은 IMS가 3G WCDMA 시장에서 선택사항이나, 오는 2008년 이후에는 필수항목이 될 것”이라며 "IMS 환경의 도입은 보다 개선된 3G 영상통화 서비스를 제공할 뿐 아니라 PTT, 모바일 게임, 모바일 VPN 서비스도 가능해 질 것"이라며 덧붙였다.